ELEMENT

UNACCEPTABLE
(0-1)

ACCEPTABLE
(1-2)

TARGET 
(3-4)

A. Project Planning

• Literature review
• Description of project/research question
• Relevance of project (needs assessment)
• Logistics of project implementation
• Permission to conduct project
• Project preparation

~One or more of the elements is missing, incomplete or inadequate

~All elements are addressed and are at least minimally adequately

~All elements are addressed with two or more being exemplars of excellent work.

B. Project Implementation

• Technology use
• Methodology

~Technology use not apparent or used inappropriately or ineffectively;
 ~Methodology not well developed or inappropriate to address project/research question

~Technology use apparent and appropriate and used effectively;
~Methodology adequately designed and implemented to address project/research question.

~Technology not use not only apparent and appropriate but represents an exemplary effort;
~Methodology well though through and an ideal choice  to address project/research question;
~Methodology implemented without difficulties

C. Project Evaluation

• Impact
• Analysis of data
• Self-evaluation
• Stakeholder evaluation

~Project has little or no impact on targeted setting/students;
~Analysis of data minimal or inaccurate;
~Self and/or stakeholder evaluation cursory or missing

~Project has obvious and positive  impact on targeted setting/students;
~Analysis of data adequate and accurate;
~Self and/or stakeholder evaluation  is informative

~Project has obvious and positive  impact on targeted setting/students;
~Analysis of data adequate and accurate;
~Self and/or stakeholder evaluation  is informative

D. Project Product Professionalism

• Use of disability sensitive language
• Communication clarity in written product
• Format of presentation appropriate for design
• Adequacy of written communication

~Written product missing or lacks professionalism;
~Language used in written product is not specific disability sensitive;
~Format and length of presentation not appropriate for selected project design;
~Numerous errors in spelling, grammar; sentence structure; typing;
~Written organization poor and interferes with understanding of product 

~Written shows initial level of professionalism;
~Language used in written product is specific disability sensitive;
~Format and length of presentation  appropriate for selected project design;
~Less than 8 errors in spelling, less than  3 grammatical errors; sentence structure is correct with up to 2 exceptions; under 3 typing errors
~Written organization is clear 

~Written shows advanced level of professionalism and, as is, has publication potential;
~Language used in written product is specific disability sensitive;
~Format and length of presentation  appropriate for selected project design;
~Less than 2 errors in spelling, less than  1 grammatical errors; sentence structure is correct with no more than 1 exceptions; under 2 typing errors
~Written organization is not only clear but exemplary